How Have Changes In The Media And Modern Technology Most Changed How Candidates Campaign?
Linotype operator in a newspaper office in San Augustine, Texas. (Credit: Library of Congress)
[1]
Learning Objectives
- Discuss the history of major media formats.
- Compare of import changes in media types over fourth dimension.
- Explain how citizens learn political data from the media.
Sometimes the public seeks opinion and analysis of complicated bug. Providing such opinions and analysis is some other important function performed past the media. The evolution of the media has been fraught with concerns and problems. Accusations of mind control, bias, and poor quality have been thrown at the media on a regular basis. Yet the growth of communications engineering science allows people today to detect more information more hands than any previous generation. Mass media can be print, radio, television set, or Cyberspace news. They can be local, national, or international. They can exist broad or limited in their focus. The choices are tremendous.
Impress Media
In earlier times, news was presented to local populations through the printed printing. While several colonies had printers and occasional newspapers, high literacy rates combined with the desire for self-government made Boston a perfect location for the creation of a newspaper, and the starting time continuous printing was started in that location in 1704.[2] During the American Revolution, newspapers took part in the effort to inform citizens of perceived British misdeeds and to incite attempts to revolt. Readership beyond the colonies increased and daily papers sprang up in big cities.[three]
Newspapers united for a common cause during the Revolutionary War. The divisions that occurred during the United states of america' early history created a change and moved the nation into the party press era, in which partisanship and political party loyalty dominated the choice of editorial content. 1 reason was cost. Subscriptions and advertising did not fully embrace press costs and political parties stepped in to support newspapers that aided their parties and their policies. Papers began printing party propaganda and messages, even publicly attacking political leaders similar George Washington. Despite the antagonism of the press, Washington and several other founders felt that liberty of the press was important for creating an informed electorate. Indeed, freedom of the press is enshrined in the Bill of Rights in the first subpoena.
Betwixt 1830 and 1860, machines and manufacturing made the product of newspapers faster and less expensive. Benjamin Twenty-four hours's paper, the New York Sun, used engineering like the linotype machine to mass-produce papers. Roads and waterways were expanded, decreasing the costs of distributing printed materials to subscribers. New newspapers popped upward.
Still readers withal wanted to exist entertained. Joseph Pulitzer and the New York World gave them what they wanted. The tabloid-style paper included editorial pages, cartoons, and pictures, while the front-page news was sensational and scandalous. This mode of coverage became known equally yellow journalism. Every bit the New York Globe's circulation increased, other papers copied Pulitzer'south manner in an effort to sell papers. Contest between newspapers led to increasingly sensationalized covers and rough issues.
In 1896, Adolph Ochs purchased the New York Times with the goal of creating a dignified newspaper that would provide readers with important news about the economy, politics, and the world rather than gossip and comics. The New York Times brought back the informational model, which exhibits impartiality and accurateness and promotes transparency in government and politics.
At the beginning of the twentieth century, the media began muckraking: the writing and publishing of news coverage that exposed decadent business and regime practices. Investigative work similar Upton Sinclair'south serialized novel The Jungle led to changes in the manner industrial workers were treated and local political machines were run. The Pure Food and Drug Act and other laws were passed to protect consumers and employees from dangerous nutrient processing practices. Local and state government officials who participated in bribery and corruption became the centerpieces of exposés.
Some muckraking journalism nevertheless appears today, and the quicker movement of data through the system would seem to suggest an environment for yet more than investigative piece of work and the punch of exposés than in the by. Even so, at the same fourth dimension there are fewer journalists beingness hired than at that place used to be. The scarcity of journalists and the lack of time to dig for details in a 24-hour, profit-oriented news model make investigative stories rare.[four]
There are ii potential concerns about the pass up of investigative journalism in the digital age. First, one potential shortcoming is that the quality of news content volition go uneven in depth and quality, which could lead to a less informed citizenry. Second, if investigative journalism in its systematic grade declines, then the cases of wrongdoing that are the objects of such investigations would have a greater take a chance of going on undetected. In the twenty-offset century, newspapers have struggled to stay financially stable. Impress media earned $44.9 billion from ads in 2003, but only $16.4 billion from ads in 2014.[5]
Given the countless alternating forms of news, many of which are costless, paper subscriptions have fallen. Advertising and particularly classified ad revenue dipped. Many newspapers now maintain both a print and an Cyberspace presence in order to compete for readers. The rise of free news blogs, such as the Huffington Mail, have made it difficult for newspapers to force readers to purchase online subscriptions to admission material they place behind a digital paywall. Some local newspapers, in an effort to stay visible and profitable, take turned to social media, like Facebook and Twitter. Stories can be posted and retweeted, allowing readers to comment and frontwards material.[6]
Nevertheless, overall, newspapers have adapted, condign leaner—though less thorough and investigative—versions of their earlier selves.
Radio
Radio news made its appearance in the 1920s. The National Broadcasting Visitor (NBC) and the Columbia Broadcasting System (CBS) began running sponsored news programs and radio dramas. Not just something to be enjoyed past those in the city, the proliferation of the radio brought communications to rural America likewise. News and amusement programs were also targeted to rural communities. As radio listenership grew, politicians realized that the medium offered a way to accomplish the public in a personal manner.
All the same it was Franklin D. Roosevelt who became famous for harnessing the political power of radio. On entering office in March 1933, President Roosevelt needed to quiet public fears almost the economic system and preclude people from removing their money from the banks. He delivered his first radio oral communication eight days after assuming the presidency.[seven] Roosevelt would sit and explain his ideas and actions direct to the people on a regular basis, confident that he could convince voters of their value.[8]
His speeches became known as "fireside chats" and formed an important way for him to promote his New Bargain calendar. Roosevelt's combination of persuasive rhetoric and the media allowed him to expand both the regime and the presidency beyond their traditional roles.[9]
As radio listenership became widespread in the 1930s (a), President Franklin D. Roosevelt took advantage of this new medium to broadcast his "fireside chats" and bring ordinary Americans into the president'south earth (b). (Credit a: modification of piece of work by George W. Ackerman; Credit b: modification of work by the Library of Congress)
While radio'south importance for distributing news waned with the increase in television usage, information technology remained popular for listening to music, educational talk shows, and sports broadcasting. Talk stations began to gain basis in the 1980s on both AM and FM frequencies, restoring radio's importance in politics. By the 1990s, talk shows had gone national, showcasing broadcasters similar Rush Limbaugh and Don Imus.
In 1990, Sirius Satellite Radio began a campaign for FCC approval of satellite radio. The thought was to circulate digital programming from satellites in orbit, eliminating the need for local towers. By 2001, two satellite stations had been approved for broadcasting. Satellite radio has greatly increased programming with many specialized offerings, including channels dedicated to particular political points of view.
Television
Idiot box combined the best attributes of radio and pictures and inverse media forever. As on the radio, quiz shows and games initially dominated the television airwaves. But when Edward R. Murrow fabricated the move to television in 1951 with his news show See It Now, television journalism gained its foothold. Every bit television programming expanded, more channels were added. Networks such as ABC, CBS, and NBC began nightly newscasts, and local stations and affiliates followed suit.
Edward R. Murrow'due south move to boob tube increased the visibility of network news. In The Challenge of Ideas (1961) pictured in a higher place, Murrow discussed the Cold War between the Soviet Marriage and the U.s.a. alongside films stars such every bit John Wayne. (Credit: OpenStax included image)
Even more than radio, telly allows politicians to accomplish out and connect with citizens and voters in deeper ways. Before television, few voters were able to see a president or candidate speak or answer questions in an interview. Now everyone can decode body language and tone to decide whether candidates or politicians are sincere. Presidents tin direct convey their anger, sorrow, or optimism during addresses.
The kickoff telly advertisements, run past presidential candidates Dwight D. Eisenhower and Adlai Stevenson in the early on 1950s, were mainly radio jingles with animation or short question-and-answer sessions. In 1960, John F. Kennedy's campaign used a Hollywood-style approach to promote his epitome as young and vibrant. The Kennedy campaign ran interesting and engaging ads, featuring Kennedy, his wife Jacqueline, and everyday citizens who supported him.
In addition to tv set ads, the 1960 election too featured the first televised presidential debate. By that time most households had a boob tube. Kennedy'south careful grooming and practiced body language allowed viewers to focus on his presidential demeanor. His opponent, Richard Nixon, was still recovering from a severe case of the flu. While Nixon's noun answers and debate skills made a favorable impression on radio listeners, viewers' reaction to his sweaty appearance and obvious discomfort demonstrated that alive television has the unique potential to make or break a candidate.[10]
In 1964, Lyndon B. Johnson was ahead in the polls, and he let Barry Goldwater's campaign know he did not want to fence.[11] Nixon, who ran for president again in 1968 and 1972, declined to debate. Then in 1976, President Gerald Ford, who was behind in the polls, invited Jimmy Carter to fence, and televised debates became a regular office of future presidential campaigns.[12]
Visit American Rhetoric for free admission to speeches, video, and sound of famous presidential and political speeches.
Between the 1960s and the 1990s, presidents often used television to reach citizens and gain support for policies. When they made speeches, the networks and their local affiliates carried them. With few contained local stations available, a viewer had little alternative just to sentinel. During this "Golden Age of Presidential Television," presidents had a strong control of the media.[13]
Some of the all-time examples of this power occurred when presidents used television to inspire and comfort the population during a national emergency. These speeches aided in the "rally 'round the flag" phenomenon, which occurs when a population feels threatened and unites around the president.[xiv] During these periods, presidents may receive heightened approval ratings, in part due to the media'due south decision about what to cover.[15]
Post-obit the terrorist attacks in New York and Washington on September 11, 2001, President George Westward. Bush'south bullhorn speech from the rubble of Ground Zero in New York similarly became a rally. Bush spoke to the workers and starting time responders and encouraged them, but his curt speech became a viral clip demonstrating the resilience of New Yorkers and the anger of a nation.[16] He told New Yorkers, the country, and the world that Americans could hear the frustration and anguish of New York, and that the terrorists would soon hear the United states of america.
President George W. Bush embraces a firefighter at the site of the World Trade Center Friday, Sept. 14, 2001, during his visit to New York City. (Credit: Paul Morse, Courtesy of the George Due west. Bush Presidential Library)
[17]
New Media Trends
The invention of cable in the 1980s and the expansion of the Cyberspace in the 2000s opened up more options for media consumers than ever before. Viewers can watch well-nigh anything at the click of a button, bypass commercials, and record programs of interest. The resulting saturation, or inundation of data, may lead viewers to abandon the news entirely or become more suspicious and fatigued about politics.[xviii]
This result, in plough, too changes the president'southward ability to reach out to citizens. For example, viewership of the president's almanac Land of the Union address has decreased over the years, from sixty-seven one thousand thousand viewers in 1993 to 30-2 million in 2015.[19]
Citizens who want to scout reality telly and movies tin can easily avoid the news, leaving presidents with no sure way to communicate with the public.[twenty] Other voices, such as those of talk show hosts and political pundits, now fill up the gap.
Balloter candidates have also lost some media ground. In equus caballus-race coverage, mod journalists clarify campaigns and blunders or the overall race, rather than interviewing the candidates or discussing their upshot positions. Some argue that this shallow coverage is a result of candidates' trying to control the journalists by limiting interviews and quotes. In an endeavour to regain control of the story, journalists begin analyzing campaigns without input from the candidates.[21]
The First Social Media Candidate
When president-elect Barack Obama admitted an addiction to his Blackberry, the signs were clear: A new generation was assuming the presidency.[22] Obama's employ of engineering was a part of life, not a campaign pretense. Perhaps for this reason, he was the first candidate to fully embrace social media.
While John McCain, the 2008 Republican presidential candidate, focused on traditional media to run his campaign, Obama did not. 1 of Obama's entrada advisors was Chris Hughes, a cofounder of Facebook. The entrada allowed Hughes to create a powerful online presence for Obama, with sites on YouTube, Facebook, MySpace, and more. Podcasts and videos were available for anyone looking for information virtually the candidate. These efforts made it possible for information to be forwarded easily between friends and colleagues. It too immune Obama to connect with a younger generation that was often left out of politics.
Past Ballot 24-hour interval, Obama'due south skill with the spider web was articulate: he had over two one thousand thousand Facebook supporters, while McCain had 600,000. Obama had 112,000 followers on Twitter, and McCain had simply iv,600.
Matthew Fraser and Soumitra Dutta, "Obama's win ways future elections must be fought online," Guardian, seven November 2008.
Are at that place whatever disadvantages to a presidential candidate'southward use of social media and the Cyberspace for entrada purposes? Why or why not?
The availability of the Net and social media has moved some control of the bulletin dorsum into the presidents' and candidates' hands. Politicians can at present connect to the people directly, bypassing journalists. When Barack Obama's minister, the Reverend Jeremiah Wright, was seen to requite inflammatory racial sermons, Obama used YouTube to answer to charges that he shared Wright's behavior. The video drew more than than seven million views.[23] To accomplish out to supporters and voters, the White House maintains a YouTube channel and a Facebook site. President Donald Trump was a heavy user of Twitter during the 2016 campaign, and he started his "Making America Not bad Again" site at USA.gov at https://www.greatagain.gov several months prior to his inauguration.[24]
Social media, similar Facebook, also placed journalism in the hands of citizens: citizen journalism occurs when citizens use their personal recording devices and jail cell phones to capture events and mail them on the Internet. In 2012, citizen journalists caught both presidential candidates by surprise. Hand Romney was taped by a bartender's personal camera maxim that 47 pct of Americans would vote for President Obama considering they were dependent on the regime.[25]
Obama was recorded past a Huffington Mail service volunteer proverb that some Midwesterners "cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't similar them" due to their frustration with the economic system.[26] These statements became nightmares for the campaigns. As journalism continues to calibration back and hire fewer professional writers in an effort to control costs, citizen journalism may become the new normal.[27] Another shift in the new media is a change in viewers' preferred programming. Younger viewers, especially members of generation Ten and millennials, like their newscasts to be humorous. The popularity of The Daily Prove and The Colbert Studydemonstrate that news, even political news, can win immature viewers if delivered well.[28]
Such soft news presents news in an entertaining and approachable way, painlessly introducing a variety of topics. While the depth or quality of reporting may be less than ideal, these shows tin can sound an alarm as needed to raise denizen awareness.[29]
Viewers who spotter or listen to programs like John Oliver'southward Last Calendar week Tonight are more than likely to be aware and observant of political events and strange policy crises than they would otherwise be.[30] They may view opposing party candidates more favorably because the depression-partisan, friendly interview styles allow politicians to relax and be conversational rather than defensive.[31]
Considering viewers of political comedy shows watch the news frequently, they may, in fact, exist more politically knowledgeable than citizens viewing national news. In two studies researchers interviewed respondents and asked cognition questions about electric current events and situations. Viewers of The Daily Prove scored more right answers than viewers of news programming and news stations.[32] That being said, it is not clear whether the number of viewers is big enough to make a big touch on politics, nor do we know whether the learning is long term or short term.[33]
Becoming a Denizen Journalist
Local government and politics need visibility. Higher students need a voice. Why not become a citizen journalist? City and county governments agree meetings on a regular basis and students rarely nourish. Yet bug relevant to students are oft discussed at these meetings, like increases in street parking fines, zoning for off-campus housing, and tax incentives for new businesses that utilise part-fourth dimension student labor. Nourish some meetings, ask questions, and write about the experience on your Facebook page. Create a weblog to organize your reports or apply Storify to curate a social media fence. If you prefer videography, create a YouTube channel to document your reports on current events, or Tweet your live video using Periscope or Meerkat.
Non interested in government? Other areas of governance that affect students are the academy or higher's Lath of Regents meetings. These cover topics like tuition increases, class cuts, and changes to student conduct policies. If your state requires land institutions to open their meetings to the public, consider attending. Y'all might exist the 1 to notify your peers of changes that bear on them.
Questions to Consider
- How have modern presidents used television to accomplish out to citizens?
Prove Answer
news conferences; upshot coverage; etc.
- Why is soft news good at reaching out and educating viewers?
Testify Reply
open up for discussion
Terms to Remember
citizen journalism–video and print news posted to the Internet or social media by citizens rather than the news media
advisory model–media exhibits impartiality and accuracy and promotes transparency in government and politics
muckraking–news coverage focusing on exposing corrupt business organisation and regime practices
soft news–news presented in an entertaining style
yellowish journalism–sensationalized coverage of scandals and human involvement stories
Source: https://courses.lumenlearning.com/americangovernment/chapter/the-evolution-of-the-media/
Posted by: henrypeargen.blogspot.com
0 Response to "How Have Changes In The Media And Modern Technology Most Changed How Candidates Campaign?"
Post a Comment